Advanced Policy Analysis
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
Assignment #4, Part II
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Assignment #3- Part II
Monday, September 13, 2010
Assingment No. 2, Part 2
Shulock Article
I agree with Shulock’s interpretive view of policy analysis. Policy analysis has changed and is no longer used only as a problem-solving tool. Policy analysis is now used to provide ideas for policy and change. I believe policy analysis can still be used in the traditional sense but as the public policy process becomes more complex it is increasingly difficult to narrow analysis for just problem solving. Policy analysis, like Shulock said, offers to provide multiple viewpoints or feedback to decision makers.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/15/us/15highway.html?ref=politics The New York Times recently reported on the metric highway signs posted in southern Arizona during the 1980’s. The signs were slated to be replaced with funds from the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act. However, after unwanted national attention and complaints from southern Arizona business owners, the project never happened. This article goes to Shulock’s point exactly. Traditional policy analysis determined that the signs should be replaced. However, interpretive view policy analysis could have pulled from several different arenas to determine the best possible outcome, especially since the public and media scrutinized the issue.
Hird Article
Hird concludes that nonpartisan policy research contributes significantly in providing information to policymakers even if it operates through non-traditional methods. Nonpartisan policy organizations can influence policymaking by providing policymakers with analysis.
I believe that nonpartisan policy anayslis organizations do contribute to the policymaking, but perhaps not to the extent Hird describes. Hird describes four factors that are necessary for NPRO’s to contribute to policy making. These four factors have influence on the likelihood of an NPRO’s contribution. Here in Arizona, a conservative state legislator, as opposed to a liberal legislator, would probably be more susceptible to influence of an organization like the Goldwater Institute. The Goldwater Institute is a nonpartisan organization but the policy research is geared toward conservative and government. Just because a nonpartisan policy organization says it is nonpartisan does not necessarily mean that it is devoid of founding principles.